Friday, March 23, 2012
Gone In a Flash
An enjoyable fun romp without over-staying its welcome.
So, it's a bit appropriate also to lift up the life of one man who has done quite a bit for fans of comic strips, cartoons, and comic books. Without his work as editor and historian, it's doubtful I'd be aware of the great art that Dan Barry did on Flash Gordon, would have come to appreciate the wackiness of Krazy Kat, or discovered the world of Barnaby by Johnson Crockett whom I solely knew as the creator of Harold and the Purple Crayon. Never warmed up to Modesty Blaise though.
In the last couple of weeks, there have been quite a few deaths of creators. Don Markstein whose passing was announced March 11th was not a comic creator, but a historian. I first encountered his name when I started regularly reading "Comics Revue" that he edited and co-created with Rick Norwood. When I started reading Revue, it was mainly devoted to story strips but it printed both current and old strips. So, it would run Sy Barry's Phantom, Lieber Spider-man, Teen-age Mutant Ninja Turtles, and Infantino on Batman alongside Dan Barry's Flash Gordon, McDonnell's Modesty Blaise, classic Gasoline Alley, etc. Over time as many of the current adventure strips failed to hang on, it focused more and more on the classic strips. I was overjoyed when they started Roy Crane's Buzz Sawyer strip. More a Cap'n Easy fan myself, but his artwork wows me regardless. Then Russ Manning's lush Tarzan strips. Wow.
The magazine took a hit when Diamond decided to only carry books that earned so much profit margin, causing them to change the way they were published and their pricing structure if they wanted to still be listed. Something to keep in mind when you're talking about the high price of comics, it's not just the publishers that dictate that price, Diamond's actions affected the pricing structure of quite a few independents.
For fandom, Don's big contribution was his site Toonopedia. It's scope encompassed comic strips, cartoons and comic book characters of all types and eras. Each article was well researched, giving you insight into the lives of the creators, publishers and context of the times as well as the influence different ones might have had on the larger genre. It was almost always interesting to read, a smorgasbord of information and characters. The only limitation seemed to be whatever struck Markstein's fancy at the time. One week might be an article on Flying Jenny and the next article be Eek! The Cat. The articles were informative but also unabashedly from his own point of view, he let you know how he felt about the art, quality, or viability of a character. I differed in point of view of whether a character like Peacemaker was a hero or not (I'm on the pro side) and he had a stubborness in listing all of the Quality characters as having been bought and owned by DC despite the lack of evidence in that regard.
Apart from enjoyment, Toonopedia was often became the first place I looked to verify a date or some information on a DC or Marvel character and was definitely an influence on me and my site, sometimes imparting leads of some obscure character worth tracking down. It was some time after I had been aware of the site before I made the connection of where I had heard Markstein's name before ie in the pages of "Comics Revue" that I had been getting for some years.
It's sad to think there are no more updates to his site, no little seen or forgotten gem uncovered or maybe new appreciation given to a character or concept otherwise written off. I wish his family well. His presence and love for the media will be missed.
Posted by
cash_gorman
at
10:51 AM
0
comments
Labels: comic strips, Comics Revue, Don Markstein, Flash Gordon, Prince Valiant
Wednesday, March 07, 2012
John Carter of Mars book
A buddy that runs a comic book store was looking for cheap copies of some hard to find masterworks and archives, and I told him I could get the one for USA Comics for him from a local to me used bookstore. As I was spending just store credit on it, I basically traded it for Dark Horse's b/w John Carter volume reprinting Marvel's series from the 1970s which he had for sale.
Reading the USA masterworks, I was again struck by the wasted potential of so many of the characters. Some, like Captain Terror and Major Liberty have hardly been seen at all. Others like the Young Avenger, Vagabond, the Defender, and Rockman have been featured in modern stories. Only to have the sense of wonder and excitement and even zaniness wiped out. The mini All-Winners Squad: Band of Heroes killed several characters in the past such as the Vagabond or in the present, the not-so Young Avenger. But, it was all about putting a veneer of realism on the characters while it placed costumed heroes undertaking war missions (not missions to stop the Red Skull or Master Man, mind you, but straight-forward military missions). The Romance aspect of superhero fiction is gone. The mini was mercifully killed at issue 5. JMS meanwhile is completing The Twelve where he takes a group of heroes from Marvel's golden-age and then does the most mundane things with them. Mr. E who hearkens to the era of the Shadow and who fought a super villain in his first appearance... none of that is mentioned, he is made into a self-hating Jew and portrayed generally as a pathetic figure. The Fiery Mask likewise became a man with feet of clay while the fantastic and exciting parts of his origin story seem to be done away with. Even the pet character of the Phantom Reporter is made into a very mundane version of the character glimpsed in his first story. Where is the sense of fun? Some years ago, Bendis brought the Defender out of the mothball just so he could kill off a hero in the story to make the bad guys look good.
Reading the John Carter omnibus is not for many modern readers. Much like reading the Doc Savage reprint of Marvel's magazine series, these are comics that actually use caption boxes to help tell the story. They underscore moments of dread and extreme emotional states, they provide a narrative voice, telling things that pictures alone cannot tell. In short, it's a marriage of words and images and requires the reader to, gulp, read! They are mostly adaptions of various John Carter serials, some into stand-alone stories, still they are written and paced as comics, adapted by pros like Marv Wolfman and Chris Claremont. You get dense stories with no padding or decompressed pacing. The sense of action that Burroughs is known for is evident. It takes Wolfman and Gil Kane three-and-a-half pages to recount Carter's back story, how he got on Mars, met the Princess and Tars in the middle of an adventure already in progress. Vs it taking Dynamite a whole comic just to get him off of Earth! Mind you, they are doing two different stories, but the older comic moves faster and is a whole lot more exciting with a sense of urgency and desperation.

One of the smartest decisions made was putting Gil Kane on the artwork, although replaced by others later on. Kane and John Buscema are probably the best artists of the time and even now when it comes to Sword & Sorcery style books. In my mind, Kane is the best artist possible for John Carter and Buscema about the best possible for Conan. All others operate in their shadow.
Pairing Kane with Rudy Nebres on inks is seemingly an odd choice at first. Normally, I'd prefer if we saw Kane inking himself. However, Nebres has an ornate and organic style. He gives the details of Kane's art an exotic feel and a depth of texture that's not normally there and seems perfectly at home with a series set on Mars. I look forward to getting to the rest of the stories contained in this volume.
If you want to check out some of the glorious work of Rudy Nebres' work on John Carter, both over Kane's pencils and sketches of his own, I'll point you here. Though he had been in comics for awhile, I first became aware of him by name from his work on covers for Archie's 1980s revival of their heroes, where he inked covers by Buckler, Ditko and others, some of which I'm showing here. Like Kane on the covers of comics at Marvel in the 1970s, Nebres' work on the covers tended to make sure the cover of the book looked far more interesting and exciting than it did on the insides!
Posted by
cash_gorman
at
4:03 PM
1 comments
Labels: Gil Kane, John Carter, Rudy Nebres, USA Comics
Monday, February 20, 2012
Earth 2

Earth 2: DC has released images coming from their next wave of books, promoting an Earth -2 line. There's the book titled Earth-2 and then a "World's Finest" title featuring Power Girl and Huntress.
Most of the online chatter seems to be about Power Girl's costume redesign. Admittedly, this is a bad design. More uses of armor where it's not needed, extraneous seams for no purpose. I can understand getting rid of the boob window, but editorial mandate for covering the legs but allowing bare arms? Who is this person in editorial that has a thing against sleeves?
Everybody seems so caught up on her breasts they don't realize the basic change in hers and Helena Wayne's characters that the cover suggests. Power Girl and Huntress were not ashamed of their pedigrees but they still debuted as women who forged their own identities and not to be immediately defined by or serve as reflections of their male mentors. Yet the cover suggests that on this new Earth-2, they were originally Supergirl and Robin. That lessens them more than changing her costume. She's had worse.
It's indicative of a slight double standard and message being sent. Look at the Batman family of books. In addition to Batman, the white men that are or were sidekicks and being featured in books: Robin, Red Robin, Red Hood, Nightwing. Now, the Batman Family book featuring a man of African descent: Batwing. The ones featuring women: Batgirl, Batwoman. All direct reflection of the head of the tamily so to speak. And, now we have a character that originally debuted as a woman with her own identity but honoring the legacies of both mother and father being retconned as once being a sidekick with a white man's former identity.
And, with Power Girl, being her own woman and not riding Superman's coat-tails was part and parcel of the whole point of her. I will probably still check it out. Levitz is the writer who has some history with these characters and artwork's by Perez and Maguire so it will definitely look good.
On that note, it's hard to get optimistic about "Earth-2" by James Robinson. This is an alternate cover and it shows us yet another heavily redesigned Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman. Speculation is that they are legacies up there, Dick Grayson as Batman and who knows as the other two. Which of course was what his Justice League title was.
Then, there's this little line from the solicits: You may think you know Earth 2…but this is DC Comics – The New 52, where anything can happen!
Ok, the thing is, title something Earth-2 and there are reasonable expectations. Not only that, the whole point of Earth-2 was not simply an alternate Earth with an alternate history. It allowed DC to be new with Barry Allen as Flash, Hal Jordan as Green Lantern while EMBRACING their original history and heritage. It was about KEEPING as much history as they could. Over time, some changes and legacies came in, but it was always about maintaining a sense of history and what went before. You start making wholesale changes, and it's really no different than other titles. Especially right now with a freshly launched DCU. The main titles are already of a new universe that readers are getting acclimated to, including new histories and backgrounds featuring Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman. The regular universe is already an "alternate universe" for readers as it's substantially different from what went before. You might be making use of the names and ideas, but it's not really the original characters. It should be noted that while Roy Thomas launched an Earth-2 legacy book in "Infiniti Inc." there was already a title in place and doing alright that was about the originals and history: "All-Star Squadron". Also, that first round of Infinitors, while legacy characters, they were not replacement characters. Like Power Girl and Huntress, they reflected their origins but they were their own identities. The originals were still around. Oh well.
Didn't take too long for them to return to type. The book is not even out yet but is already talked about mattering to the main continuity, that it will tie in to the main continuity down the road. Not a mistake that the cover has them fighting what looks like Parademons.
Meanwhile, that same month, hopefully you're keeping up with what's going on in one of the main Batman books as its plotline will highjack the story across the various Bat-family lines including the Jonah Hex book! So much for not trying to turn away potential new readers.
Also just reported, the re-launch has apparently hurt sales of the trade market. Are they really surprised? The comic book shared-universe business plan is built on a basic model driving sales. 1) The Collector mentality that has fans searching out back issues (and now trades and such) and driving that 2) Past stories matter. Thus first issue appearances go up in value and highly sought after. The company rarely gets any of that money in the pre-Trade days but it helped their distributors' sales and helps make fans feel like they are part of the club, sharing and seeking after gems at shows and such.
I couldn't help but think at the time after "Crisis on Infinite Earths" and the subsequent reboots that came in the years after, this had to hurt back issue sales somewhat. After all, what does it matter what Krypto's first appearance was if he no longer existed? You have the company basically saying the character doesn't matter. Pre-Crisis Superboy and Supergirl? All the Legion of Super-Heroes reboots? Hawkman? At the time there was no real way to track that kind of effect since the trade market really didn't exist as it does now, but it seemed logical that if new stories weren't potentially fueling interest in the back-market, it would start dying down. The only possible evidence we have of it is the steady demise of the comic stores. One store I go to does a pretty good business on back-issues but he says it's because many stores don't make back-issues a priority any more.
Now, we have a strong trade market, reprinting everything not nailed down. We can see how rebooting and the company basically saying their old stuff doesn't matter can negatively impact sales of that same material, essentially drive down the value of their library. What will they learn from this if anything?
Posted by
cash_gorman
at
12:25 PM
1 comments
Labels: DC Comics, George Perez, huntress, Maguire, Power Girl
|



